BBC’s Covid Fake News: Lab-Leak Truth Exposes Their Disinfo Game:
BBC: German spy agency 'believed Covid likely started in lab':
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz7vypq31z7o
"The BBC’s spent years playing disinfo watchdog, smearing lab-leak talk as “dangerous misinformation” while crowning skeptics as conspiracy loons. Now, with the CIA, FBI, Germany’s BND, and more pointing to a Wuhan lab blunder, their fake news house of cards is crumbling—yet they’re still dodging the wreckage they built.
Rewind to 2020-2021: the BBC was wet-market central. Their May 27, 2021, “Covid origin” piece half-acknowledged the lab-leak theory, only to smother it with WHO’s “extremely unlikely” mantra and scientist snubs, winking at Trump’s taint. By March 2023’s “Toxic debate,” they platformed a virologist dismissing it as “conspiracy horseshit,” framing believers as nutters. They peddled disinformation—hard—propping up The Lancet’s dodgy “conspiracy” letter while branding dissenters reckless.
Fast forward to today’s bombshell: Germany’s BND pegged an 80-90% chance in 2020 that Covid leaked from Wuhan’s lab—experiments gone wrong, safety botched, Merkel muzzling it. The CIA’s January 2025 call says “more likely” lab than nature (low confidence), echoing the FBI’s “moderate confidence” since 2023. The DOJ hasn’t ruled it official, but their FBI wing’s been vocal—Wray’s said it outright. X’s @TheSeeker268 flagged the CIA’s shift early; it’s no fringe tale anymore. Intel’s stacking up, and the BBC just nods like they didn’t trash this for years.
They’ve got form—slamming X users, Tom Cotton, anyone questioning the script as disinfo merchants. Cotton’s 2020 lab hint? “Debunked conspiracy,” they parroted. Meanwhile, their own Covid yarn ignored Wuhan’s lab risks and gain-of-function ties, churning fake news while finger-wagging at “misinformationists.” Now, with BND’s 80-90%, CIA’s reassessment, and FBI’s stand, it’s clear: the BBC’s narrative was the real con.
No apology, no reckoning—just a quiet pivot. Five years on, Covid’s origin’s murky, but the BBC’s disinfo glow-up shines bright. They smeared, they spun, and now they slink off as authorities like CIA, FBI, and BND rewrite the story. Call it out: fake news in a suit. Next time they cry “conspiracy,” check who’s really lying."
Source: Q/Grok
#BBCDisinformationist #FakeBBCNews #UltimateCovidCrimes
Unnatural evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 variants and possibility of deliberate natural selection:
"Over the past three years, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has repeatedly caused pandemics, generating various mutated variants ranging from Alpha to Omicron. In this study, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary processes leading to the formation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, focusing on Omicron variants with many amino acid mutations in the spike protein among SARS-CoV-2 isolates. To determine the order of mutations leading to the formation of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, we compared the sequences of 129 Omicron BA.1-related, 141 BA.1.1-related, and 122 BA.2-related isolates, and attempted to clarify the evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, including the order of mutations leading to their formation and the occurrence of homologous recombination. As a result, we concluded that the formation of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 was not the product of genome evolution, as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombinations. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis showed that Omicron variants were formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic"
(Tanaka, A., & Miyazawa, T. (2023). Unnatural evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 variants and possibility of deliberate natural selection)